Nursery Rhymes on Cultures Knee – Western Version: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. Islamic Version: Words, images, body language will ‘provoke’ me to break your bones with swords and guns and I will certainly hurt you.

Nursery Rhymes on Cultures Knee

Western Nursery Rhyme Outcome______________Islamic Nursery Rhyme Outcome

Nursery Rhymes on Cultures Knee:

Western 1872 version: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.

“Sticks and Stones” is an English language children’s rhyme. It persuades the child-adult victim of name-calling to ignore the taunt, to refrain from physical retaliation, and to remain calm and good-natured.

Role in Western culture
This sentiment is reflected in/reflects the Western common law of civil assault, which holds that mere name-calling does not give rise to a cause ‘provocation’ of action, while putting someone in fear of physical violence does.

The corner stone values of Democracy

Western 2015 version: Swords and guns may break my bones, but words, images, body language will never hurt me.

Western “Duty to Doubt” Be doubtful, Be sceptical, Be critical.

Certainty is the root of all evil.

Accept being doubted, accept being viewed as untrustworthy, and accept being criticised without resorting to violence.

The state has a monopoly on the legitimate use of coercion.

The corner stone values of Tyranny

Islamic version 7th century C.E– 2015: Words, images, body language will ‘provoke’ me to break your bones with swords and guns and I will certainly hurt you.

Role in Islamic culture
This sentiment is reflected in/reflects the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex to justify assault and murder, which holds that mere name-calling justifiably gives rise to a cause ‘provocation’ of action, whilst no fear of physical violence exits.

Islamic “Duty to Certainty” Be certain, Be compliant, Be silent.

Doubt is the root of all evil.

Other accept the certainty Islam is right, Other accept compliance to Islamic dictates, Other accept silence as to the veracity of the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) template) or accept violence ‘provoked’ by Others failure to accept.

The state does not have de facto monopoly on the legitimate use of coercion.

What will happen, what has happened particularly to women when there is a demand as a societal norm the ‘victim’ should have acted ‘responsibly’ to prevent ‘provocation’ of the perpetrators violence, the victim therefore deserves what they get?

“To make one exception means to make them all.”
Blaming the Victim: Charlie Hebdo and Free Speech By Nicole Gelinas, January 18, 2015 New York Post

As with a person as with a culture utilising such a notion of ‘provocation’ which justifies violent action where no threat of violence exists this construct will invariably run through the whole of cultural method for dealing with internal and external nonconformity to cultural codex dictates.

This is what we want in Western Democratic streets a return to a “Duty to Certainty” and the terror which always follows in its wake as we have had clear proof of for centuries and even in our own time?

“Forty-five churches were torched over the weekend in Niger’s capital during deadly protests over the publication of a Prophet Mohammed cartoon by the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, police say.

The protests, which left five people dead and 128 people injured in Niamey, also saw a Christian school and orphanage set alight, said Adily Toro, a spokesman for the national police.”
Charlie Hebdo: 10 killed, 45 churches torched during protests over Prophet Mohammed cartoon in Niger; Chechnya rally draws 1 million, Russia says – ABC

ABC in showing just half the new Charlie Hebdo front page in news broadcasts sent what message? Respect? Respect for whom, the victims or the cultural perpetrator? By your action ABC you are informing what norm now in the Australian Public Square?

You do of course understand ABC – Cultures justify and authorise terror the individual adherent ‘Few’, as individuals or in groups deliver it. Who is then ‘responsible’ the victim, the individual ‘Few’ or the culture which created the individual ‘Few’ and is still doing so?

Enough, is Enough! A CHARLIE HEBDO T-Shirt Design for every occasion.

Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?

Advertisements

“Freedom of Religion” – Why just Religion? – ‘Freedom of All Ideology’ – Sounds Fair? Nations ultimately more just and more peaceful and more successful?

Image

Religious Freedom Is a Tenet of Foreign Policy, Obama Says By PETER BAKER FEB. 6, 2014 

“History shows that nations that uphold the rights of their people, including the freedom of religion, are ultimately more just and more peaceful and more successful,” Mr. Obama

 “..more just and more peaceful and more successful”

This may be true where a common view of Other exists but as just the Muslim terror on the streets of Britain alone demonstrates ; ‘Freedom of Religion’ is allowing terror to proliferate, not only internal but external, and major societal schism to unfold, even Tony Blair has determined there is an inherent ‘problem’ with Islam which is leading to major societal schism..

The question has to be asked how many lives lost how much wealth and opportunity wasted on enabling the Freedom of Muslims in our streets – if the answer were no deaths no wealth misdirected then Obama would have some justification clearly he has none.

In fact the reality is the reverse.

Mr. Obama  ‘History shows that nations that uphold the rights of their people, including the freedom of religion, are ultimately less just and less peaceful and less successful,’

Egypt, Tunisia, Iran etc reveal what regards  ‘Freedom of Religion’ ?

Freedom to do What to Whom, For Whose Benefit?

Clearly not Other and women.

The absurdity is Obama himself points out regards Iran the very result of allowing a religious construct ‘Freedom’ which includes a genocide notion of Other in its codex anywhere near the Public Square.

“..an Iranian-American pastor imprisoned in Iran since September 2012 and sentenced to eight years in prison for disturbing national security by creating a network of Christian churches in private homes.”

How do you go about it. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child…

Does anyone seriously consider ‘Freedom of All Ideology’ on our streets without restriction? How is it despite certain religions having exactly the same construct of Other as certain fascist secular ideology one is regarded as acceptable and the other not? Given the result for Other are the same?