“Freedom of Religion” – Why just Religion? – ‘Freedom of All Ideology’ – Sounds Fair? Nations ultimately more just and more peaceful and more successful?

Image

Religious Freedom Is a Tenet of Foreign Policy, Obama Says By PETER BAKER FEB. 6, 2014 

“History shows that nations that uphold the rights of their people, including the freedom of religion, are ultimately more just and more peaceful and more successful,” Mr. Obama

 “..more just and more peaceful and more successful”

This may be true where a common view of Other exists but as just the Muslim terror on the streets of Britain alone demonstrates ; ‘Freedom of Religion’ is allowing terror to proliferate, not only internal but external, and major societal schism to unfold, even Tony Blair has determined there is an inherent ‘problem’ with Islam which is leading to major societal schism..

The question has to be asked how many lives lost how much wealth and opportunity wasted on enabling the Freedom of Muslims in our streets – if the answer were no deaths no wealth misdirected then Obama would have some justification clearly he has none.

In fact the reality is the reverse.

Mr. Obama  ‘History shows that nations that uphold the rights of their people, including the freedom of religion, are ultimately less just and less peaceful and less successful,’

Egypt, Tunisia, Iran etc reveal what regards  ‘Freedom of Religion’ ?

Freedom to do What to Whom, For Whose Benefit?

Clearly not Other and women.

The absurdity is Obama himself points out regards Iran the very result of allowing a religious construct ‘Freedom’ which includes a genocide notion of Other in its codex anywhere near the Public Square.

“..an Iranian-American pastor imprisoned in Iran since September 2012 and sentenced to eight years in prison for disturbing national security by creating a network of Christian churches in private homes.”

How do you go about it. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child…

Does anyone seriously consider ‘Freedom of All Ideology’ on our streets without restriction? How is it despite certain religions having exactly the same construct of Other as certain fascist secular ideology one is regarded as acceptable and the other not? Given the result for Other are the same?